First, and probably most important, is the chemistry structure. These results should be unacceptable to those serious about using a product of this nature to fight cancer.Īs will be further explained below, there are two big differences between graviola products and paw paw. The second leading graviola product had a potency level of 2% that of paw paw so paw paw was about 50 times as potent as that product. The first one had a cyto-toxic potency level of about 4% of the potency of paw paw-in other words, paw paw had about 24 times the potency of this product. Jerry McLaughlin on two leading graviola products on the market. Tests were done under the direction of Dr. While some people have no doubt seen some success with graviola, it is important to note the differences and understand why it is not even close to equivalent with paw paw when used for this purpose.
The reported use of graviola as an anti-carcinoma treatment has gone back for decades. In fact, some companies go so far as to call their product "Paw Paw"-attempting to capitalize on the good name of paw paw-even at times justifying their deception by saying that graviola is sometimes called "Brazilian paw paw." Graviola is also known by other names, such as "guanabana" and "soursop". Some unscrupulous (as well as some well-meaning-but uninformed) companies and their vendors attempt to pass off a graviola supplement product as equivalent to paw paw. Graviola is Inferior to Paw Paw for the Purpose of Fighting Cancer.
0 kommentar(er)
